If you’re a member of any online group that focuses on access or disability, chances are you’ve read about more than a few “Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access shortfalls”. Granted, in this day and age this shouldn’t happen, but it does. Why? Well the short answer is because there’s no “ADA Police Force” that goes around and looks for access violations. For the most part, the Department of Justice (DOJ) relies on user-input to decide when and where to issue fines or take remedial action. And where does that user-input come from? In a few words, from you and the rest of the general public.
And the good news is, it’s easy to file and ADA complaint. Unfortunately most people just brush off the access shortfalls they encounter, and skip reporting them to the DOJ. It’s true that the DOJ does not move forward and take action on every single complaint; however if they don’t receive any complaints, it virtually guarantees that access shortfalls will remain unchanged. And that’s why we still encounter ADAAG code violations, over 30 years after the ADA was signed by President George Bush.
The ADA Complaint Process
It’s easy to file an ADA complaint. Just go to https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ and complete the form. Keep it short and sweet and get right to the violation. And try to leave your emotions out of it. A well written concise complaint will get more attention than a wordy unorganized one.
After the DOT receives a complaint, they review it. If there are any questions they will contact you. At the very least they will confirm that they received your complaint.
Next they check to see if the item addressed is covered under the ADA. For example, if someone complains about the height of a hotel bed, no action is taken because bed height is not regulated by the ADA (https://emerginghorizons.com/why-the-ada-doesnt-address-bed-height/). They also make sure that the complaint is in the right department. So if they get a complaint about an air travel issue, they will not address it because air travel is covered under the Air Carrier Access Act, not the ADA.
If the DOJ does decide to move forward with an ADA complaint, there are a few ways things can go. The most popular choice is mediation. This is when they assign an impartial mediator and have the parties sit down in a neutral location and hammer out a workable solution. It’s a little time intensive, but the results are usually worth it.
Of course, the best outcome is when fines are issued or a lawsuit is initiated and remedial action is required. This tends to make companies stand up and take notice. On the other hand, some cases are not pursued. This could be because the DOJ is targeting certain violations, geographic areas or even providers. And the DOJ does look for patterns — like an increase in specific violations — so reporting ADA issues is always good.
Mediation Works!
Just for the record, I do practice what I preach, as I have filed several ADA complaints. All of them were addressed in one way or another, but one of my most successful efforts actually went to mediation.
About 15 years ago I was summoned to jury duty in a small town; and I was totally gob smacked when I discovered that there was not a single accessible restroom in the entire courthouse. I brought this to the attention of a few supervisors and the prevailing attitude seemed to be that anyone with a disability could get excused so they didn’t really need those accessible facilities. But what if they wanted to do their civic duty and serve on a jury? That option was pretty much taken away from them due to the lack of accessible restrooms.
So I filed an ADA complaint. Shortly thereafter I got a phone call saying my complaint was referred to mediation, and that I would be getting a call from the mediator. The mediator called and explained the process and set up a meeting time that worked for all parties. I was expecting something adversarial, but it was all very businesslike. I explained the problem, and of course the city folks claimed “budget issues” but in the end they realized they were obligated to provide accessible facilities at the courthouse.
And it all had a happy ending. Although it didn’t happen overnight, they redid the restrooms in the courthouse and put in a large accessible unit. In my opinion it was a win-win for everyone, and it really took very little effort on my part.
Sometimes Fines are Imposed
The DOJ can also start legal proceedings as the result of an ADA complaint. Such was the result of an ADA complaint filed by one couple against a Columbus, Ohio Holiday Inn Express (https://archive.ada.gov/badrivishal_sa.pdf).
The complaint was filed by the wife of a man who has multiple sclerosis, and requires a roll-in shower to bathe. She reserved an accessible room with a roll-in shower at the property, but when they arrived they discovered that neither of the two accessible rooms had a roll-in shower. Since her husband was unable to use the tub/shower combination in the accessible room, they were forced to relocate to another hotel during the busy Thanksgiving weekend.
The hotel claimed that they were up to code in regards to their accessible facilities; however a subsequent access audit found that there were many ADA violations. Under the DOJ agreement, the hotel was required to remove access barriers in the parking lot, building entrance, public restrooms, front desk, and the routes of travel within the hotel. They were also required to fix the access shortfalls in their accessible rooms, and add one more accessible room to the inventory.
The agreement also required additional training for the hotel staff on how to accommodate guests with a disability. And as part of the settlement, the hotel paid the couple that filed the complaint $20,000. Granted, nobody should have to endure access shortfalls like these in this day and age, but thanks to this complaint, one more property is now truly accessible to wheelchair-users.
Excuses, Excuses!
I’ve been preaching this “file an ADA complaint” mantra for several decades. Many folks are receptive to it, however few follow through with any action. I’ve gotten many excuses for this reluctance. Here are some of my favorites, along with my arguments against them.
“I addressed the issue with the manager who seemed eager to correct things.”
A good manager always makes you feel that your complaint is valid and will be addressed. It’s what happens after you leave that really matters. Many managers won’t take the time to follow up on access related issues. And even if the manager tries to pursue things, if the higher ups nix the idea it’s a no-go. Which is why it’s a good idea to file an ADA complaint, even if you also personally addressed the issue with on-site staff — to make sure that things get fixed.
“It takes too long to file a complaint.”
Everything takes time, but truly it takes less time to file and ADA complaint than to tell your story on numerous Facebook groups. It’s all about using time wisely.
“I’m not the ADA police.”
Well actually, you are. We don’t have inspectors or officials that go around looking for ADA violations, so the only way they get reported is if average citizens complain. And that means everyone!
“Nothing ever happens with these complaints. It’s just a waste of time.”
The DOJ doesn’t have the staff to address all of the complaints; however a good number are referred to mediation, and some are even pursued legally. You can’t really predict what will happen to any complaint, but you can be sure that the issue won’t be addressed if you don’t submit a complaint.
Filing an ADA complaint helps effect change. Just do it.
https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/
